Kvothe Is an Unreliable Narrator — A Bard Telling His Own Legend
As a bard by nature, Kvothe embellishes or fabricates parts of his tale, so the Waystone story cannot be taken at face value.
About: Kvothe
Also involves: Chronicler, Bast, Felurian, Edema Ruh, Waystone Inn
The theory§
Kvothe's retrospective account at the Waystone Inn cannot be taken wholly at face value, because Kvothe is by nature a bard, a profession defined by the art of embellishment. The broad skeleton of events is sound, since too many independent witnesses know pieces of his story and parts of it are corroborated within the frame, including the innkeeper Kote killing scrael that should be beyond ordinary men. Yet Kvothe openly holds that too much truth ruins a good story and that a good story beats a true one, and Bast warns Chronicler to watch for Kvothe's lies. Particular episodes, above all the night with Felurian, are flagged as prime candidates for exaggeration, an old man romanticising the feats of his youth. A subtler reading notes the narration is unreliable less through outright lies than through omission and limited vantage: Kvothe relates only his side and withholds what the framing Kote already knows but the younger Kvothe did not, preserving the mystery.
Evidence§
We know bards. It's what they do. Is is epic retrospective tale in the Waystone inn total bullshit?
OP's core claim: as a bard, Kvothe may fabricate his Waystone tale — u/HeardnSeenKvothe makes no bones about the fact that *too much* truth will ruin a good story, and that a good story beats a true story any day.
Refines theory: Kvothe himself prioritizes good story over truth — u/BoveyKvothe is a petty liar and Bast even tells chronicler to look over Kvothes lies under the tread of Death.
Adds in-text evidence: Bast warns Chronicler about Kvothe's lies — u/TheGreatMuffinOrgSomething tells me, at the bare minimum, Kvothe wasn't *so good at the sex* that he blew a Fairy Queen's mind his first go around, though I could believe *he* thinks he was (if it happened at all).
Flags Felurian episode as prime candidate for exaggeration — u/Sly_Mong00seWe have met too many other people who are familiar with his story for the whole thing to be a complete fabrication.
CounterCounter: too many independent witnesses for total fabrication — u/BoveyCompletely full of shit would make sense if we had never actually seen kvothe do things no one else could do. But we have, so he's at least partially truthful.
CounterCounter: frame shows Kvothe doing things only he could, so partly true — u/skidmarkundiesThere's probably no lies told to us, but definitely it's not the whole story because Kvothe is not omniscient and omnipresent, so he can only tell his side of things, he also probably omitted a lot of things that he already know in the frame
Refines: unreliability via omission and limited vantage, not lies — u/LightningRavenIt is the nature of stories, after all, to be embellished a bit. Whats that quote from Scarpi; "The truest stories are never true"
Closes chain: embellishment is inherent to storytelling itself — u/Irish-lawyer
Book refs: NOTW, WMF
Tier reasoning§
no change
Contributors§
- u/AshMontgomery — countered · 137 pts
- u/Bovey — corroborated · 59 pts
- u/TheGreatMuffinOrg — corroborated · 35 pts
- u/Sly_Mong00se — clarified · 29 pts