Lanre's Immortality: His Name Is Sympathetically Bound to the Moon
Lanre's deathless power is sympathy drawing limitless energy from the ever-moving moon, with the link hidden in the Lackless box.
Also involves: Sympathy, Shaping, Naming, Selitos, Iax, The Lackless Box, The Creation War, Master Kilvin
The theory§
This theory divides the magic of the Chronicle into older 'esoteric' arts (naming, shaping, grammarie, glamourie) and later 'mundane' arts (sympathy, sygaldry, alchemy), arguing the mundane crafts were shaped into being by Lanre and Iax as a teachable, rule-bound access to the universe's deeper nature. It reads Lanre's binding of Selitos, 'Silanxi, I bind you. By the name of stone, be still as stone,' as a sympathetic binding, and treats his inability to die as proof that his name is sympathetically linked to an inexhaustible external power source: the ever-moving moon. Selitos's lament that he could no more extinguish Lanre's burning name than throw a stone and strike down the moon is taken as a direct textual tie between Lanre and the moon. The proposed hidden link is housed in the Lackless box, and Lanre would only die if the moon itself fell from the sky. The reading is bolstered by Kilvin's standing challenge to design an ever-burning lamp, answered here by powering it from the perpetually moving moon, and by the parallel of young Kvothe binding his lungs to the open air, an external reservoir.
Evidence§
There is a somewhat strange divide in the magic system of KKC, split into 2 halves. … the esoteric seems far more natural. For one, it's older. … sympathy is bound by very arbitrary rules. … which makes me think that the mundane magic was created by the esoteric magic. … it was shaped by Lanre and Iax.
OP frames sympathy as a later art shaped into being by Lanre and Iax. — u/SaltAndMetal"Silanxi, I bind you. By the name of stone, be still as stone. … How did Lanre best Selitos' naming ability? Simple, he didn't. His new power is sympathy, and this is a sympathetic binding. The effects seem identical to when devi and kvothe bind one another in book 2
Reads Lanre's binding of Selitos as a sympathetic binding, not naming. — u/SaltAndMetalThe main one is that it renders him completely unable to die. … "his new-won power burned him back into his body, forcing him to live". … "your name burns with the power in you. I could no more extinguish it than I could throw a stone and strike down the moon". "Strike down the moon". Huh.
Lanre's deathlessness plus Selitos's moon line tie his power to the moon. — u/SaltAndMetalI believe that Lanre's name is sympathetically bound to the ever-moving moon … An essentially unlimited amount of energy, pulled from the movement of the moon. This is why he can't die. For as long as the moon moves, Lanre will move also. … If the moon falls from the sky, there would be nothing left to power Lanre, and he would die.
Core claim: name bound to the moon as an inexhaustible source; dies only if moon falls. — u/SaltAndMetalThe thing inside the lockless box is a piece of the moon. With it, a sympathist could form a link to the moon and pull essentially unlimited energy. … This also fits into the story of Jax Hespe tells, that he caught the moon's name inside a box.
Identifies the missing sympathetic link as a moonrock in the Lockless box. — u/SaltAndMetalAlso supported by Master Kilvin’s question - how would you make an ever burning lamp … ? With this theory in mind, make the source the ever moving moon …
Comment adds Kilvin's ever-burning lamp challenge as supporting parallel. — u/GGB_alltimeI remembered the scene when Kvothe is a boy and binds his lungs to the air in the sky. This series is all about mirroring stories.
Comment reinforces theory via Kvothe-binds-lungs mirror of an external reservoir. — u/ProfessorMoosePhDKvothe binds Felurian in the same way Lanre binds Selitos, but he uses her true name, not sympathy. Lanre could have done something similar. Since we’ve been shown binding is possible with naming, we can logically assume that’s what Lanre did. No one is shown in the past to use sympathy
CounterCounter: binding likely done by naming, not sympathy; nobody used sympathy then. — u/walletinsuranceTo add a counterpoint, it’s said that closer to the time of the creation war, the “mundane” crafts and the “esoteric” crafts were only ever used simultaneously. … This suggests to me that they did exist
CounterCounter to the shaping premise: mundane crafts already existed, used with esoteric ones. — u/ShinraTenseiSensei
Book refs: NOTW, WMF
Tier reasoning§
tier unchanged; inventive mechanism built on suggestive but indirect quotes
Contributors§
- u/GGB_alltime — corroborated · 18 pts
- u/ProfessorMoosePhD — extended · 8 pts